Does “No Sugar” or Sugar Alternatives Mean a Healthier Choice?

In recent years, food and beverage options labeled as "no sugar" or "sugar-free" have gained popularity, often marketed as healthier options. But does skipping sugar or using sugar alternatives really make a product better for your health?

Image: Freepik/azerbaijan_stockers

Removing sugar can reduce calorie intake, but many sugar-free items replace sugar with artificial sweeteners or sugar alcohols like aspartame, sucralose, or xylitol. These substitutes offer sweetness without the calories, but some artificial sweeteners can impact gut health, insulin response, and even appetite, leading to mixed health outcomes.

Image: Pexels/Himalayan Karen

Stevia, a popular natural alternative, is often considered a healthier choice because it doesn’t typically spike blood sugar or add calories. However, many commercial stevia products contain fillers like erythritol, dextrose, or maltodextrin, which can dilute the benefits and sometimes cause digestive issues, especially with sugar alcohols like erythritol. For a purer option, look for stevia products without additives and use them in moderation.

Image: Freepik/jcomp

Ultimately, "no sugar" doesn’t always mean healthier. Whole, minimally processed foods and a balanced diet remain the most reliable approach to nutrition, with or without sugar.